Variation of Energy Consumption in Barracks through Simulation by Year of Completion
© Copyright Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze & suggest the variation of energy consumption consequent on thermal insulation performance strengthening from early 2000s when modernization of barracks began until the present targeting a large barracks.
To carry out this research, this study surveyed the standard of thermal insulation by year, which is being applied to a barracks by conducting literature search, and selected the standard model for a barracks. Also, this study analyzed energy consumption by year & region by performing simulation(ECO2)of the selected standard model.
As a result, it was analyzed that in case of a building which was completed in 2015, the energy consumption for air-conditioning & heating, lighting, and hot water supply over the year 2000 reduced by 11% on the average in central district, 10% on the average in southern district, and 17% on the average in Jeju, respectively.
Keywords:
Energy consumption, Barracks, Simulation, Thermal Insulation Performance키워드:
에너지 소요량, 군 생활관, 시뮬레이션, 단열성능1. Introduction
1.1. Background and Purpose of Study
Recently, Korean government implements a variety of policies such as building certification system with the aim of energy saving in buildings. For military facilities, however, policy on energy saving is not established.
Barracks are integrated facilities which include quarters for soldiers and some of administrative facilities which represent high percentage of all military facilities as typical defense and military facilities. In particular, barracks are being modernized since the early 2000s and they become large as gross area increase.
Although insulation design standards are determined and insulation guidelines are proposed as they are also residential areas, study on evaluation of energy consumption or energy saving is not sufficient due to confidentiality and security of military facilities if compared with common civil buildings.
This study intends to select a standard model for barracks and analyzed the change of energy consumptions according to the change of insulation performance from the early 2000s until now.
1.2. Method of Study
This study uses the following method to calculate energy consumptions of barracks.
First, literature search is performed to investigate insulation standards applied to barracks and analyze the trend of annual change.
Second, a standard barrack model is selected for simulation by literature search and investigating the plane of barracks constructed since the early 2000s.
Third, simulation (ECO2) is performed by applying annual and regional insulation standards in order to analyze energy consumptions for the selected standard model (barracks).
2. Consideration of Relevant Regulations and Standards
2.1. Standards on National Defence and Military Facilities
Standards on defense and military facilities were established in 1969 which become the standard for barracks and as of 2014, there are 97 rules of which 57 are standards and 37 are guidelines.
The change of insulation design standards for military quarters applied to barracks1) is as follows.
Building Code Article 23 Section 4, "Energy Saving in Buildings" was established in December 1975 to stipulate that measures shall be taken to prevent heat loss when building a structure and Building Code Enforcement Ordinance Article 16, "Prevention of Heat Loss in Buildings" was established to stipulate heat control method for prevention of heat loss such as structure, material and construction method of wall, ceiling and openings, which are specified by the Minister of Construction.
Standard on Heat Transmission Coefficient was established in September 1979 to stipulate that the ceiling of top floor and outer wall of residential structures shall be constructed to have less than 0.9kcal/㎡h℃, outer wall of structures other than residential ones shall be built to have less than 1.8 kcal/㎡h℃ and windows of residential structures which have contact with ambient air shall be made as double window or pair glass.
Standards on heat transmission coefficient was reinforced in December 1980 to stipulate that the outer wall of living room and the ceiling or roof of living room in top floor shall be constructed to have less than 0.5kcal/㎡h℃ of heat transmission coefficient, floor(including floor which has contact with the ambient air of living room) of living room in the bottom story shall be constructed to have less than 1.0kcal/㎡h℃ or insulated by using an insulation material of more than a half of separately specified thickness and the windows which have contact with the ambient air of living room shall be constructed to have less than 3.0kcal/㎡h℃ of heat transmission coefficient or built by using double window or pair glass.
Regions were divided into two areas of Jeju-do and other areas in December 1984. Regions were divided again into three areas of central region, southern region and Jeju-do in June 1987.
Standards on classification of insulation materials were reinforced in December 1988 and were classified as "Rules on Design Standards, etc. of Buildings" in June 1992.
Standards on energy saving design have been transferred from Building Code to Green Building Establishment Act and heat transmission coefficients were reinforced to less than 0.18~0.47 W/㎡K in October 2013 and some revisions were made in April and October 2013 and September and December 2014.
Central regions were sub-divided again into three regions in May 2014 by considering insulation conditions suitable for climate characteristics.2)
2.2. Standards on Insulation of Military Quarters
This study applied insulation standards stipulated by relevant regulations and those for military quarters. Table 1 shows standards on heat transmission coefficient of barracks based on standards on insulation of military quarters in the central region.
3. Selection of Standard Model
3.1. Analysis of Current Status of Barracks
The current status of barracks and progress of change3) were analyzed to select a simulation model for analyzing load in barracks.
one-story buildings of middle size were used before 1982 and minimum convenience facilities were installed outside. Since then, two- or three-storied integrated barracks of medium and large size were built up until early 2000s and convenience facilities such as baths, PX were placed inside the building.
Since early 2000s, squad-specific bed-type barracks of three- or four-storied large size have been built and multi-purpose hall, cyber knowledge room, space for women, etc. were expanded. It indicates that soldiers had standing lifestyles before entering the service, social infrastructure related to computer system was highly developed and the number of woman soldiers increased.
Fig. 1 shows the annual change of gross area of large barracks.
3.2. Selection of Standard Barrack Model
In order to calculate energy consumptions by using simulation, this study uses a standard model based on large barracks which greatly increase since 2000s as shown in Fig.2.
The gross area (9,065㎡) of large barracks provided by standards on floor area of defense and military facilities was used for the size of the standard model4).(Table 2) Based on the basic modules in the reference floor, rooms were placed according to uses in each floor through vertical and horizontal zoning5) and as a result, a standard model has been selected which has 2,189㎡ of building area and 9,049㎡ of gross area as shown in Table 3.
The intensity of illumination set for each zoning6) is shown in Table 4. Ventilation has not been considered, however, as the standard7) on defense and military facilities is the same for barracks.
Table 5 and Fig. 2 show architectural surface area, floor plan and cross-sectional plan of the selected standard model.
4. Results of Analysis
This study uses ECO2 by considering calculation of energy consumption and total load, possibility of simulation in locations where barracks are located, provision and compatibility of climate data and use of easy of military officials.
We selected five central regions (Seoul, Incheon, Wonju, Chuncheon and Cheongju), seven southern regions (Busan, Daegu, Daejeon, Gwangju, Gangneung, Jeonju and Mokpo) and Jeju for which climate data is provided as specified in the Operational Rule of Building Energy Efficiency Certification System as the regions for analysis.
4.1. Results of Analysis on Annual Energy Consumption According to Regions
Energy consumption simulation was performed for the regional, standard barracks model according to the change of insulation standards.
Among heating, cooling, hot water and lighting, energy consumptions for hot water and lighting were calculated to be 20.6kWh/㎡·y and 22.7kWh/㎡·y, respectively. It is the result from the analysis of simulation modeling according to use zoning where residence type of barracks and use characteristics of each room such as administrative facilities and support facilities are reflected.
Energy consumptions of each region were changed by heating and cooling and Table 6 shows the results.
According to the results from analysis of energy consumptions of the standard model by applying the standard as of 2000, the barracks model of Chuncheon showed the highest vale (126.6kWh/ ㎡·y) and that of Incheon showed the lowest value (114.6kWh/ ㎡·y) in the central region. The barracks model of Daejeon showed the highest value (120.0kWh/㎡·y) and that of Busan showed the lowest value (97.2kWh/㎡·y) in the southern region. Barracks model of Jeju resulted in 109.5kWh/㎡·y.
According to the results from analysis of energy consumptions of the standard model by applying the standard as of 2005, the barracks model of Chuncheon showed the highest vale (125.7kWh/ ㎡·y) and that of Incheon showed the lowest value (113.8kWh/ ㎡·y) in the central region. The barracks model of Daejeon showed the highest value (119.4kWh/㎡·y) and that of Busan showed the lowest value (96.9kWh/㎡·y) in the southern region. Barracks model of Jeju resulted in 100.3kWh/㎡·y.
According to the results from analysis of energy consumptions of the standard model by applying the standard as of 2008, the barracks model of Chuncheon showed the highest vale (123.6kWh/ ㎡·y) and that of Incheon showed the lowest value (112.1kWh/ ㎡·y) in the central region. The barracks model of Daejeon showed the highest value (106.5kWh/㎡·y) and that of Busan showed the lowest value (95.9kWh/㎡·y) in the southern region. Barracks model of Jeju resulted in 98.3kWh/㎡·y.
According to the results from analysis of energy consumptions of the standard model by applying the standard as of 2010, the barracks model of Chuncheon showed the highest vale (115.8kWh/ ㎡·y) and that of Incheon showed the lowest value (105.6kWh/ ㎡·y) in the central region. The barracks model of Daejeon showed the highest value (109.9kWh/㎡·y) and that of Busan showed the lowest value (91.1kWh/㎡·y) in the southern region. Barracks model of Jeju resulted in 92.9kWh/㎡·y.
According to the results from analysis of energy consumptions of the standard model by applying the standard as of 2015, the barracks model of Chuncheon showed the highest vale (111.4kWh/ ㎡·y) and that of Incheon showed the lowest value (102.1kWh/ ㎡·y) in the central region. The barracks model of Daejeon showed the highest value (106.5kWh/㎡·y) and that of Busan showed the lowest value (88.8kWh/㎡·y) in the southern region. Barracks model of Jeju resulted in 90.9kWh/㎡·y.
The results of regional energy consumption simulation indicate that Chuncheon has the highest energy consumption and Busan has the lowest energy consumption. Jeju-do showed higher energy consumption than Busan although it is located in a region with lower latitude.
4.2. Results of Analysis on Monthly Energy Consumption According to Regions
As energy consumptions for how water and lighting are found to be identical, monthly energy consumptions for heating and cooling of each region are calculated and shown in Fig. 3.
According to the results, energy consumptions for heating of each region tend to decrease 24% and 43% on average in the central and southern region, respectively as insulation conditions are reinforced from 2000 to 2015. On the contrary, energy consumptions for cooling increased 13%, 5% and 12% on average in the central and southern regions and Jeju-do, respectively.
Based on the buildings completed in 2015, energy consumptions for cooling and heating decreased 21%, 17% and 28% on average in the central and southern regions and Jeju-do, respectively compared with those in 2000 and if lighting and hot water loads are considered, 11%, 10% and 17% of energy consumptions decreased on average in the central and southern regions and Jeju-do, respectively.
5. Conclusion
This study analyzed and quantified the change of energy consumptions according to the reinforcement of insulation conditions from early 2000s where the modernization of large barracks started until now.
The results of this study are summarized as follows.
1) Based on the standard model, insulation conditions from 2000 to 2015 were applied and simulation program (ECO2) was used to calculate energy consumptions of five central regions (Seoul, Incheon, Wonju, Chuncheon and Cheongju), seven southern regions (Busan, Daegu, Daejeon, Gwangju, Gangneung, Jeonju and Mokpo) and Jeju-do. Energy consumptions for hot water and lighting of each region were calculated to be 20.6kWh/㎡·y and 22.7kWh/㎡·y, respectively, according to energy consumptions for cooling and heating, Chuncheon showed the highest value and Busan had the lowest value. Jeju-do showed higher energy consumptions than Busan although it is located in a region with lower latitude.
2) Based on the buildings completed in 2015, energy consumptions for cooling and heating decreased 21%, 17% and 28% on average in the central and southern regions and Jeju-do, respectively compared with those in 2000 and if lighting and hot water loads are considered, 11%, 10% and 17% of energy consumptions decreased on average in the central and southern regions and Jeju-do, respectively.
This study was performed to provide basic data for energy remodeling study according to completion years as the time arrives to repair large barracks which have been constructed since early 2000s. Further study will be performed on optimum energy remodeling in consideration of economy and environment friendliness based on this study.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MOE) (NRF-2011-0017656)
Notes
References
-
국방시설본부, “군부대의 지역적 특성을 고려한 효율적인 단열 설계방안 연구”, 국방시설본부, (2014).
Defense Installations Agency, A Study on Efficient Thermal Insulation Design Plan in the light of Regional Characteristics of a Military Camp, Defense Installations Agency, (2014). -
국방부, “국방·군사시설기준 DMFC 4-20-50 군 주거시설 단열설계 기준(2014.5.22 제정)”, 국방부, (2014).
Ministry of National Defense, National defense & Military Facility Standard DMFC 4-20-50 Thermal Insulation Standard of Military Housing Facility(2014.5.22., established), Ministry of National Defense, (2014). -
국방부, “국방·군사시설 Design Collection”, 국방부, (2009).
Ministry of National Defense, National Defense & Military Facilities Design Collection, Ministry of National Defense, (2009). -
국방부, “국방·군사시설기준 DMFC 3-30-10 건축면적 기준(2014.8.1 개정)”, 국방부, (2014).
Ministry of National Defense, National defense & Military Facility Standard DMFC 3-30-10 Building Area Standard(2014.8.1., revised), Ministry of National Defense, (2014). -
국방부, “국방·군사시설기준 DMFC 5-10-10 생활관 설계지침(2014.4.1 개정)”, 국방부, (2014).
Ministry of National Defense, National defense & Military Facility Standard DMFC 5-10-10 Residence Hall Design Guidelines(2014.4.1., revised), Ministry of National Defense, (2014). -
국방부, “국방·군사시설기준 DMFC 4-40-40 조명 및 전열설비 설계기준(2013.7.25 개정)”, 국방부, (2014).
Ministry of National Defense, National defense & Military Facility Standard DMFC 4-40-40 Lighting & Electric Heat Equipment Design Criteria(2013.7.25., revised), Ministry of National Defense, (2014). -
국방부, “국방·군사시설기준 DMFC 4-30-10 공기조화설비 설계 기준(2014.1.2 개정)”, 국방부, (2014).
Ministry of National Defense, National defense & Military Facility Standard DMFC 4-30-10 Air-conditioning Equipment Design Criteria(2014.1.2., revised), Ministry of National Defense, (2014).