KIEAE Journal
[ Article ]
Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment - Vol. 14, No. 5, pp.49-57
ISSN: 2288-968X (Print) 2288-9698 (Online)
Print publication date Oct 2014
Received 30 May 2014 Revised 12 Oct 2014 Accepted 15 Oct 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2014.14.5.049

Assessment of the Distribution of the Street Trees of Suwon City for Biodiversity

ChoiSun A* ; KimShin Won**
*Dept. of Landscape Architecture, master’s course, KyungHee Univ., South Korea **Corresponding author, Dept. of Landscape Architecture, KyungHee Univ., South Korea

This research is about analysis and evaluation of biodiversity of Suwon’s street tree, then understanding the problem of it and finally finding a solution. Because the increasing damage of the street trees by disease and insects, insecticide is applied to prevent further damage. However, this insecticide is found to be cancer genic and causing hygienic threat to civilians. Therefore, by gathering Suwon’s internal statistics about Suwon’s street tree, the trees are divided into three categories, tall evergreen trees, deciduous trees, shrubs following Frank’s 30-20-10 theory(1990). Also, according to species diversity index, the problem of disease and insect is researched in terms of biodiversity, and here we suggests solutions to counter such problems.

According to the results, the trees planted in Suwon was found to be 31 families, 43 genus and 58 species. The most used kinds, almost 85% of the whole species, are found to be Rhododendron indicum (L.) Sweet, Buxus koreana Nakai ex Chung & al, Euonymus japonicus Thunb, Ligustrum obtusifolium Siebold & Zucc. Besides these, the rest of 15% of street trees had little variety. Therefore, it is necessary to plant tree variously and equally in terms of biodiversity. If this Frank’s 10-20-30 solution is not enough to completely solve coulure problem, then further research will be done on soil properties, and local features for improvement of Suwon street tress.

Keywords:

street tree, Shannon-Weiner species diversity index, evenness index

1. Introduction

1.1. Purpose and Background of the study

The proliferation of air pollution in urban environment and the increased demand for leisure life due to the enhancement of the life standard of the citizens living in them, the demand and the awareness on the importance of the green areas in the city is advancing. However, the green areas in cities are split up or diminishing rapidly due to a number of development products going on everywhere in the country. For this, the cities have been relying on planting street trees to provide cozy and safety living environment as well as to protect the citizens from possible disasters.1)

As far as the street trees are concerned, it is important to select suitable species of trees that could grow successfully in the urban environments. However, since the selection of the street trees currently being plant is limited a handful of them, these tress are not functioning as desired in terms of preventing environmental damages and pests.

According to the statistics of the Bureau of Forestry, the spices of street trees planted in Korea are mainly composed of cherry blossoms(25%,) ginkgo(17.9%), and maple trees(6.8%), showing a heavy emphasis on cherry blossoms and ginkgo. This makes them highly vulnerable against a possible threat of pests, which could increases the magnitude of damages geometrically.

One of the most profound cases of such disasters is Dutch elm disease. Due to the invariant selection of trees planted in the affected area, not a single one of them could be free from the influence of the disease. The damage was beyond catastrophic. In case of Korea, cheonan, which invariably selected a single species for the street trees, had more than half of the street trees in the city affected by pests, requiring urgent management of the trees.

As a means to cope with the threats from pests, Korea uses insecticides. However, these agents contain Buprofezin and Benomyl, which are carcinogenic, and pose a public health threat to all citizens.2)

For this reason, we focused our study on the biodiversity of the street trees in Suwon and examined the distribution of different species and the problems involved, based on the concept of 10-20-30 suggested by Frank.S which signified that a proper mix of species of street trees could be highly effective as a biological means to fight pests. With such an examination, in this study, we also proposed a solution for the problems the city currently faces to contribute to the progress of the field of street tree management.

1.2. Study trends

The studies on the biodiversity of street trees is more active in foreign countries than in Korea. In case of Korea, Seongjin Yoon (2012) studied the occurrence of pests in street trees of Suwon for all of its species over a period of 5 months. The result showed that 27 species suffered 27 different diseases and 21 different types of pests. The species that suffered the heaviest damages were Rosa multiflora Thunb. var. platyphylla Thory and conifers. On the other hand, Sophora japonica L. or Chionanthus retusus Lindl. & Paxton were virtually free from such damages.

Gyoungjae Lee (1996) examined the status of the street trees and the problems related to the management of them in Korea with a focus on the cities of Seoul and Incheon. His study showed that there were 66 different species planted in those cities. However, the share of those outside of the top 5 species were only 3% combined, which was posing a problem. Also, his study mentioned that the contents of organic matters and water in the soil on which the trees were growing was not sufficient to support proper growth of them. As a result, his suggested several solutions to cope with such problems, emphasizing that the most important element of solution was consistent management of them.

Frank Santamour's study on trees for urban planting showed that ensuring diversity of the species planted as street trees could significantly reduce the damages inflicted by pests, emphasizing the importance of biodiversity for the street trees in preventing massive losses of street trees and ensuring protection from new diseases that could be introduced from foreign countries.

In case of Tokyo, the share of Ginkgo and Platanus occidentalis L. until 1960s, which triggered a significant debated. Since then, however, they make sure no single species would exceed 10% in its share among the total population of street trees, introducing new laws and regulations to ensure biodiversity of street trees in the city.


2. Study procedure

2.1. Target Area

The special area of the study was the entire city of Suwon, Kyounggi-do. Suwon was the hub of sea transportation in the past and now enjoys a highly convenient network of national highways connecting it with other major cities of the country, such as Kyounggbu, Youngdong, Shingal-Ansan Highway, Euiweon-Asan Highway, and Gyoungbu railway, etc. In the city, quite a number of pedestrians and drivers, as well as other users are using the street trees.3)

2.2. Study process and method

The processes of this study was as follows; firstly, I examined the existing literature to identify the necessity of this study. Then, based on the data received from the Landscaping Architecture Department of Suwon city, I firstly divided the roads into 'gil,' 'ro,' and 'etc' depending on the characteristics of the road. Then, based on the identified species, I presented the results in accordance with the principles in 10-20-30 method of Frank.S. In addition, by utilizing the Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index (SHDI) and Shannon’s Evenness index (SHEI), I analyzed the value of biodiversity of the street trees in the city, which was in turn organized in tables using Microsoft Excel 2010.

The SHDI(H’) and SHEI(E) calculated in this study were based on the following formula; ni = the total number of individual species, N = the total of all species, pi = relative proportion of a species, s= total number of all species

The principles of Frank.S is as follows;

1. No single species shall account for more than 10% of the total population.

2. No single genus shall exceed 20% of the total population.

3. No single family shall exceed 30% of the total population.


3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Distribution of street trees in Suwon

The total number of street trees planted in the city was 2,105,940 units, which were composed of 31 families, 43 genus, and 58 species.

Gwonsun district had the largest population of street trees in the city with 787,486 trees(37.39%) planted on its gil, followed by Yeongtong District, which had 716,874 trees(34.04%.) Jangan Distract had 374,304 trees(17.77%) and, lastly, Paldal District had the lowest number of street trees, 227,276(10.79%.)

In case of the types of the roads, the majority of the trees were planted on the 'ro,' followed by the 'gil' and 'etc' types of roads.

The most representative species on the gil were Rhododendron indicum (L.) Sweet, Buxus koreana Nakai ex Chung & al, Euonymus japonicus Thumb, Ligustrum obtusifolium Siebold & Zucc. which accounted for 85% combined.

species of trees distribution in Suwon-si

3.2. The roads and the number of species in each district based on the principle of 10-20-30

1) Gwonsun District

The type of road with the largest variety of families was ro, which had 23 different families. On the other hand, the 'etc' types of roads had the lowest number, 14. Of these three types of roads (gil, ro, and etc), Buxaceae, Celastraceae, Ericaceae, Pinaceae were commonly used within 30%. Of these, the evergreen tree of Pinaceae(approx 90%) had the highest share.

According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single family to account for more than 30%. For this reason, 3 families from the gil, 4 families from ro, and 3 families from etc types of road had to be reduced.

The type of road that had the largest variety of genus was ro, which had 30 genus. On the other hand, etc types of the roads had only 15 genus, which was the lowest. Of these roads (gil, ro, and etc) the commonly discovered genus within the 20% limit were Buxus, Euonymus, Pinus, and Rhododendron. Of these, the evergreen tree of Pinaceae(approx 97%) had the highest share. According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single genus to account for more than 20%. For this reason, 5 genus from the gil, 4 genus from ro, and 3 genus from etc types of road had to be reduced.

The type of road with the largest variety of species was ro, which had 37 different species. On the other hand, etc types of roads had the lowest in number, which was 15. Of the three types of the roads (gil, ro, and etc), the number of commonly found species within the limit of 10% were 13, namely japonicus, biloba, buergerianum, densiflora, glyptostroboides, indicum, koreana, palustris, retusus, schlippenbachii, serrata, turbinata, and yedoense. Of these, densiflora was the highest in ratio. According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single species to account for more than 10%. For this reason, 10 species from the gil, 10 species from ro, and 6 species from etc types of road had to be reduced.

2) Youngtong District

The type of road with the largest variety of families was the gil, which had 20 different families. On the other hand, the 'etc' types of roads had the lowest number, 7.

Of these, the most commonly used families within the 30% limit were, respectively, Celastraceae, Ulmaceae, and Oleaceae. Of these, Celastraceae had the highest share in all, accounting for 52%. Next in the list was Oleaceae, which was 34%. According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single family to account for more than 30%. For this reason, 4 families from the gil, 4 families from ro, and 2 families from etc types of road had to be reduced.

The type of road with the largest variety of genus was the gil, which had 27 genus. On the other hand, the 'etc' types of roads had the lowest number, 7.

In the three types of the roads, the most commonly used genus within the limit of 20% were, respectively, Chionanthus, and Euonymus. Of these, the largest in share was Euonymus, which accounted for 53%. Next up in the list was Chionanthus. According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single genus to account for more than 20%. For this reason, 5 families from the gil, 4 families from ro, and 3 families from etc types of road had to be reduced.

The type which had the largest number of species was the gil, which had 33 different species. The type with the lowest number of species was the 'etc,' which only had 7. The number of the commonly used species within the 10% limit was 5, namely japonica, japonicus, koreana, retusus, and serrata. Of these, japonicus had the majority share, accounting for 50%. It was followed by retusus and serrata, accounting for 23%. According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single species to account for more than 10%. For this reason, 9 species from the gil, 8 species from ro, and 6 species from etc types of road had to be reduced.

3) Jangan District

The type of road with the largest variety of families was the gil, which had 16 different families. On the other hand, the 'etc' types of roads had the lowest number, 3. The commonly used families within the 30% limit were Oleaceae and Ulmaceae. Of these, Oleaceae had the largest share of all, accounting for 50%. It was followed by Ulmaceae, accounting for 32%. According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single family to account for more than 30%. For this reason, 5 families from the gil, 4 families from ro, and 2 families from etc types of road had to be reduced.

The type of road that had the largest variety of genus was ro, which had 18 genus. On the other hand, etc types of the roads had only 3 genus, which was the lowest. There were no commonly used genus within the 20% limit. However, there were some that were used on the gil and ro. The number of commonly used species was 4, which were, respectively, Euonymus, Ligustrum, Pinus, and Zelkova. Other than that, there were no overlapping species. According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single genus to account for more than 20%. For this reason, 5 genus from the gil, 4 genus from ro, and 2 genus from etc types of road had to be reduced.

Of these, the type of the roads which had the largest number of species was the gil, which had 26. The lowest in number was the other type, which had only three. The number of the commonly used species within the limit of 10% was 3, which were, respectively, retusus, serrata, and yedoensis. Of these, the species that had the largest share was serrata, which accounted for 27%. According to the principles of Frank.S, it was prohibited to have a single species to account for more than 10%. For this reason, 9 species from the gil, 5 species from ro, and 3 species from etc types of road had to be reduced.

4) Paldal District

The road type that had the largest number of families was the gil, which had 23 families. And, etc road type had the least, having only 4. The commonly used family within the 30% limit was Oleaceae, which accounted for 67%, surpassing other trees. Each of the gil, the ro, and etc types had 3 families in excess of the limit presented in Frank.S principle.

The type of the road that had the largest number of genus was the gil, which had 25. And, the type with the lowest variety was etc type, which had only 4. Each of the gil and the ro had 4 genus in excess of the limit presented in Frank.S principle, while etc type had 3 genus in excess.

The type that had the largest number of species was the gil, which had 28. etc type had the least, having only 5. In general, it was confirmed that the 'etc' type of road had the lowest in number. This is believed to be because of the fact that the number of main gil and under roadwork type of roads were smaller in number compared to the other two types (the gil and the ro.) The three commonly used species within the limit of 10% were koreana, schlippenbachii, and yedoensis. Of these, schlippenbachii had the highest portion, accounting for approx. 22%. Next up in the list was yedoensis, accounting for 16%. According to the principles of Frank.S, 7 species from the gil, 7 species from ro, and 4 species from etc types of road had to be reduced.

3.3. The suggestions on the number of species based on the types of th e roads and the principle of 10-20-30

The variety of the species was heavily dependent on a handful of species, signifying a high probability of a catastrophe when an infestation strikes. Therefore, I suggested an alternative mix in accordance with the 10-20-30 principle in order to reduce the probability of such damage. Since there is no guideline for biodiversity of street trees in Suwon, it was assumed that the numbers suggested were the same with the total number of trees that are currently planted. Also, the number of species was determined under the assumption that these numbers should evenly be distributed among the species of which the number of trees is scarce.

The suggestions, therefore, was suggested in the number of threes that satisfies the requirement for each family, genus, and species.

1) The distribution of the suggested tree mixture for Gwonsun District

In terms of the families, Pinaceae accounts for 90% of the trees. Therefore, the number needs to be reduced. Therefore, 216 trees have to be reduced from the gil, while 7,201 trees have to be reduced from the ro. In 'etc' types of the roads, 127 trees have to be reduced. Also, it is necessary to find an alternative family to replace Pinaceae.

In terms of the genus, a large number of shrubs has to be reduced. Therefore, on the gil, Buxus(25%) has to be reduced by 18,041 trees, Euonymus(25%) by 17,873, and Rhododendron(30.6%) by 37,909. From the ro, Euonymus(33.2%) has to be reduced by 42,350 trees and Rhododendron(33.7%) by 43,752. From the 'etc' type of the roads, Euonymus(67.6%) has to be reduced by 55,233 trees. The reduced trees have to be replaced with other trees of which the current share is scarce.

In case of the species, the number of evergreen trees in the gil was smaller than desirable. Therefore, 7 more species need to be introduced. In terms of deciduous trees, the biloba has to be reduced by 386 trees, the retusus by 183, the serrata by 1,071, and the yedoensis by 2,341. Of the shrubs, 35,876 trees should be removed, while the reduced trees are to be replaced with other species.

In ro, 10 more evergreen species were needed. Of the deciduous trees, two species accounted for 70% of all deciduous trees. Therefore, one species should be reduced by 6,062 trees. In terms of the shrubs, maximum 32,040 trees for a single species would be sufficient.

Finally, for the 'other' type of the roads, the densiflora(100%,) of the evergreen trees, accounted for the entire evergreen trees. Therefore, a maximum of 18 trees would be sufficient. In terms of the deciduous trees, 248 trees for a single species would be sufficient. In case of the japonicus, 66,837 trees has to be reduced, while the Koreana should be reduced by 321.

In conclusion, the suggestions made in this study are as shown in table 2, 3, and 4.

Distribution of street tree according to family in Gwonseon District.

Distribution of street tree according to Genus in Gwonseon District.

Distribution of street tree according to species in Gwonseon District.

2) Distribution species suggested for Yeongtong District

In case of the 'families' when compared to the deciduous trees in the gil, there was no family that accounted for more than 30% of the total population. This indicates that the tree mix of this type of road is much more evenly distributed. However, The gaps between the species of the largest numbers and those with the lowest number were still significant, signifying that further efforts are needed to enhance the balance of the mixture.

On the other hand, the number of families was not as high in the 'etc' type of the roads compared to others. And, it turned out that they completely lacked any evergreen trees. In case of deciduous trees and shrubs, Oleaceae and Celastraceae were in excess of the limit. Therefore, each of them require a reduction of 24 trees and 3,586 trees, respectively.

In case of the mixture of genus, the number of trees should be reduced as suggested in Table 6. Especially, tall evergreen trees were found in the 'etc' type of trees, which require more of these types to be planted.

Distribution of street tree according to family in Yeongtong District.

Distribution of street tree according to Genus in Yeongtong District.

Distribution of street tree according to species in Yeongtong District.

As for the species, the shrubs had more reduction compared to etc types of trees (evergreens, deciduous trees.) It is believed that this is because of several species removed in large numbers. For this reason, it is also believed that new trees of different kinds should be planted in order to replace the ones that have been removed.

3) Distribution of the suggested tree mixture in jangan District

In case of the 'families,' the ro needed larger reductions compared to the gil. This means that the proportion of a single family in ro was higher than that in the gil. It also signifies that the imbalance of the mixture is heavier in ro than it is in the gil. Therefore, I believe they need to give efforts to restore the balance of the mixture. In addition, tall evergreen trees and shrubs were planted in the 'etc' types of the roads, which require other types of trees to be planted.

In case of the genus, it was confirmed that a large number of shrubs need to be reduced in the gil and the ro. Therefore, the sufficient number of shrubs in the gil would be 31,429, and 39,591 for the ro.

Distribution of street tree according to family in Jangan District.

Distribution of street tree according to Genus in Jangan District.

Distribution of street tree according to species in Jangan District.

In case of species, it was confirmed that a significant reduction was required in terms of the shrubs in the gil and the ro. Therefore, reductions as suggested in table 10 are necessary. It turned out that the 'etc' types of the road did not require any reduction of evergreens and shrubs.

4) Distribution of the suggested tree mixture in Paldal District

As for the families, a comparison of the planted trees revealed that the gap between the ones with higher proportion and those with lower proportions was significant. In case of evergreens and shrubs, the level of diversity was low, and a majority of trees were concentrated in a single family. As for the deciduous trees, Ginkgoaceae, which are commonly discovered in Korea, turned out be planted in the gil and the ro in large numbers, which required reductions. In the 'etc' types of the roads, a maximum of 10 deciduous trees and 676 shrubs need to be planted.

Distribution of street tree according to family in Paldal District.

Distribution of street tree according to Genus in Paldal District.

Distribution of street tree according to species in Paldal District.

As for the genus, reductions as specified in table 12 are required. Especially, the number of shrubs needs to be reduced significantly, and it requires other replacements in its place and evenly distributed mixture of trees for that matter.

As for the species, the nigra, which is an evergreen, exceeded the limit slightly in the gil. But, it did not require any reductions. As for the deciduous trees, the biloba, the serrata, and the yedoensis need to be reduced by 1,186, 222, and 247, respectively. As for the shrubs, the japonicus and the obtusifolium need too be reduced by 12,928 and 53,568. In the ro, the tall evergreens and the deciduous trees need to be increased by 27 and 377 trees. As for the shrubs, a maximum of 11,610 trees need to be planted. The tall evergreens in the 'etc' types of road did not require any reduction. However, since there were tall evergreen trees, it is believed that the city needs to plant such types of trees.

Street tree Species richness, diversity index, evenness index in Suwon-si

3.4. The richness and diversity indices for the street trees of Suwon

In order to evaluate and suggest the biodiversity within the population, we used Shannon-Weiner's biodiversity index. In case of Gwonsun district, the evenness index showed that the evenness value in the ro of Gwonsun District was lower than that of the gil in the same district. This means that the selection of species in the ro is leaning toward a single species excessively. Of the three types of the roads, the etc types of the roads had the most evenly distributed mixture(0.307), while the richness of the species was significantly lower than those of the other two. Therefore, it is necessarily to increase the number of species deployed in this type of road.

In case of Yeongtong District, the richness of the species was higher in the gil compared to the ro. However, the diversity index value and the evenness index value were lower than those of the ro. In terms of the evenness index, the 'etc' type was the highest in all three. However, in terms of the richness, it was the lowest of all, requiring planting of more species.

As for Jangan District, the gil were higher in terms of the richness. But, the evenness value and the diversity index were lower than those of the ro. Therefore, they need to distribute the planted species more evenly and increase the richness of the species. The type of road that had the highest evenness value was the 'etc' type. However, the diversity index was significantly lower than those of th other two. It should be raised from the current 11.15 to 161.62.

In case of Paldal District, the ro did not have as many species as the gil. However, the mixture was more evenly distributed compared to the gil. The evenness index was the highest in the 'etc' type of the road. However, they was lower in terms of the richness, which should be raised from the current 21.43 to 155.40.

The overall evaluation of the biodiversity in the city of Suwon showed that, while the richness was higher, this did not resulted in higher evenness indices. And, even when the evenness was higher, the richness of the species was lower. It is believed that this is because the focus in planting street trees was made mainly on the aesthetic qualifies. Therefore, it is necessary to diversify the species in order to increase the species richness, the diversity index, and the evenness index.


4. Conclusion

Thee purpose of this study was, as a means to enhance the health of the users of the street trees and protect the trees from biological threats and pests, to evaluate them in terms of their biodiversity and identify the current problems they face, along with suggestions for solutions and improvements.

For this reason, we collected the distribution data of the street trees and surveyed the distribution of the trees based on the scientific names of the trees in the bio species knowledge data base. Then, the distribution of the trees and Shannon-Weiner's biodiversity index were used to provide possible solutions for improvement. As a result, it turned out that the total number of street trees planted in the city was 2,105,940 units, which were composed of 31 families, 43 genus, and 58 species.

The result of the analysis of the species distribution based on the principle of 10-20-30, the mixture was heavily dependent on a few, and a significant number of trees were in excess of the limits proposed in the principle. Also, while the number of planted trees was significant, it was revealed that the number of other species than the few was scarce, exposing the entire population to the threat of pests significantly. Therefore, as a means of biological prevention, the selection of the species and even distribution of the mixture need to be considered. This will, in turn, contributed to reduction of pest control costs and enhancement of the health of the citizens.

However, in spite of the significance and implication of this study, it is still true that the 10-20-30 principle alone cannot resolve all pest threats, and additional studies in the future would be necessary, putting the soil and the local environmental factors into consideration.

References

  • Gwak, No-jun, (2010), A Study on the Urbanscape improvement direction by streetscape and view corrider in case of Su-won city, Gangnam University Master Thesis.
  • Lee, kyung-jae, (1996), Maintenance of the city's street tree boulevards Status and Problems of Korea, -Focused on the city of Seoul and Incheon-.
  • Lee, kyu-wan, chin, Sang-chul, (1998), The Study on the Methods of Selection for Increase in Diversity of Street Trees, Journal of Environmental Research, 3(1), p2.
  • Yoon, Sung-jin, (2012), Study on the observation of disease and insects of street trees in Suwon, Sungkyunkwan University Master Thesis.
  • Li, Zhi-hua, (2011), Comparison and Analysis of Street tree in Beijing, China and Daejeon, South Korea : Focused on species diversity and introduction, PaiChai University Master Thesis.
  • Lee, Hoo-nam, (1980), study of the plant communities analysis of the Mt. Hanla based on the species diversity index, Ewha Womans University Master Thesis.
  • Baris, Kara, (2012), Assessment of the distribution and diversity of street tree species in Aydin, Turkey, Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 10(3&4), p919-928.
  • Frank, S. Santamour, (1990), trees for urban planting: diversity uniformity, and common sense, 7: proceedings, p57-66.
  • http://www.kyeonggi.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=721128.
  • Natural Bio Species Knowledge Data Base(NATURE), http://www.nature.go.kr.
  • Suwon city ebook, (2007), an illustrated plant book, Suwon city.

Table 1.

species of trees distribution in Suwon-si

Suwon-si
plant ro gil etc.
the number % the number % the number %
tall evergreen trees 12,875 1.08% 3,249 0.37% 181 0.14%
deciduous trees 76,151 6.40% 33,950 3.86% 2,891 2.26%
shrubs 1,101,143 92.52% 843,432 95.78% 125,082 97.60%
total 1,190,169 100% 880,631 100% 128,154 100%

Table 2.

Distribution of street tree according to family in Gwonseon District.

road plant >30.1(%) Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
Family
gil tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 316 216 100.5
deciduous trees Rosaceae 4,723 1,137 3,586.2
shrubs Ericaceae 109,660 2,034 107,626.5
or tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 10,307 7,209.5 3,097.5
deciduous trees Cornaceae 33,511 15,326.2 18,184.8
shrubs Celastraceae 106,431 10,308.9 96,122.1
Ericaceae 107,833 11,710.9
etc. tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 181 126.7 54.3
deciduous trees Oleaceae 1,292 549.2 742.8
shrubs Celastraceae 78,840 43,629.8 34,810.2

Table 3.

Distribution of street tree according to Genus in Gwonseon District.

road plant >20.1(%) Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
Genus
gil tall evergreen trees Pinus 316 249 67
deciduous trees Prunus 4,723 2,332 2,390.8
shrubs Buxus 89,792 18,041 71,751
Euonymus 89,624 17,873
Rhododendron 109,660 37,909
ro tall evergreen trees Pinus 10,307 8,242 2,065
deciduous trees Cornus 33,511 21,388 12,123.2
shrubs Euonymus 106,431 42,350 64,081.4
Rhododendron 107,833 43,752
etc. tall evergreen trees Pinus 181 145 36.2
deciduous trees Chionanthus 1,292 797 495.2
shrubs Euonymus 78,440 55,233 23,206.8

Table 4.

Distribution of street tree according to species in Gwonseon District.

road plant >10.1(%) Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
species
gil tall evergreen trees densiflora 282 248.5 33.5
strobus 34 0.5
deciduous trees biloba 1,581 385.6 1,195.4
retusus 1,378 182.6
serrata 2,266 1,070.6
yedoensis 3,536 2,340.6
shrubs japonicus 74,024 38,148.5 35,875.5
indicum 89,280 53,404.5
koreana 90,170 54,294.5
obtusifolium 64,440 28,564.5
ro tall evergreen trees densiflora 10,303 9,270.5 1,032.5
deciduous trees kousa 33,511 27,449.4 6,061.6
palmatum 10,214 4,152.4
shrubs japonicus 90,831 58,790.3 32,040.7
koreana 32,958 917.3
schlippenbachii 107,680 75,639.3
serrata 57,520 25,479.3
etc. tall evergreen trees densiflora 181 162.9 18.1
deciduous trees palustris 377 129.4 247.6
retusus 1,292 1,044.4
yedoensis 268 20.4
shrubs japonicus 78,440 66,836.6 11,603.4
koreana 11,924 320.6

Table 5.

Distribution of street tree according to family in Yeongtong District.

road plant >30.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
Family
gil tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 1,066 516.4 549.6
Taxaceae 624 74.4
shrubs Celastraceae 105,240 39,176.1 66,063.9
Oleaceae 71,669 5,605.1
ro tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 1,071 749.4 321.6
deciduous trees Ulmaceae 3,703 1,399.3 2,303.7
shrubs Celastraceae 165,900 25,895.1 140,004.9
Oleaceae 218,060 78,055.1
etc. deciduous trees Oleaceae 94 24.4 69.6
shrubs Celastraceae 5,976 3,585.6 2,390.4

Table 6.

Distribution of street tree according to Genus in Yeongtong District.

road plant >20.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
Genus
gil tall evergreen trees Pinus 1,066 699.6 366.4
Taxus 624 257.6
deciduous trees Zelkova 2,095 193.8 1,901.2
shrubs Euonymus 105,240 61,197.4 44,042.6
Ligustrum 71,440 27,397.4
ro tall evergreen trees Pinus 1,071 856.6 214.4
deciduous trees Zelkova 3,703 2,167.2 1,535.8
shrubs Euonymus 165,900 72,563.4 93,336.6
Ligustrum 217,420 124,083.4
etc. deciduous trees Ulmus 53 6.6 46.4
Chionanthus 94 47.6
shrubs Euonymus 5,976 4,382.4 1,593.6

Table 7.

Distribution of street tree according to species in Yeongtong District.

road plant >10.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
species
gil tall evergreen trees parviflora 1,066 882.8 183.2
cuspidata 624 440.8
deciduous trees japonica 1,067 116.4 950.6
biloba 1,575 624.4
retusus 1,368 417.4 950.6
serrata 2,095 1,144.4
yedoensis 1,025 74.4
shrubs japonicus 98,840 76,818.7 22,021.3
obtusifolium 71,440 49,418.7
ro tall evergreen trees densiflora 1,071 963.8 107.2
deciduous trees biloba 790 22.1 767.9
glyptostroboides 892 124.1 767.9
retusus 1,285 517.1
serrata 3,703 2,935.1
shrubs japonicus 139,400 92,731.7 46,668.3
koreana 51,420 4,751.7
obtusifolium 217,420 170,751.7
etc. deciduous trees davidiana 53 29.8 23.2
japonica 45 21.8
retusus 94 70.8
yedoensis 40 16.8
shrubs japonicus 5,976 5,179.2 796.8
koreana 1,260 463.2

Table 8.

Distribution of street tree according to family in Jangan District.

road plant >30.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
family
gil tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 546 238.5 307.5
Taxaceae 460 152.5
deciduous trees Ulmaceae 3,008 669.2 233.8
shrubs Celastraceae 60,520 11,876.8 48,643.2
Oleaceae 72,780 24,136.8
ro tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 1,077 71,439 362.1
deciduous trees Ginkgoaceae 2,204 978.5 1,225.5
Ulmaceae 1,284 58.5
shrubs Oleaceae 132,886 73,499.8 59,386.2
etc. deciduous trees Oleaceae 33 7.2 25.8
Ulmaceae 41 15.2

Table 9.

Distribution of street tree according to Genus in Jangan District.

road plant >20.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
Genus
gil tall evergreen trees Pinus 546 341.0 205.0
Taxus 460 255.0
deciduous trees Zelkova 3,008 1,448.8 1,559.2
shrubs Euonymus 60,520 28,091.2 31,428.8
Ligustrum 72,780 40,351.2
ro tall evergreen trees Pinus 1,077 835.6 241.4
deciduous trees Ginkgo 2,204 1,387.0 817.0
Zelkova 1,284 467.0
shrubs Euonymus 39,636 45.2 39,590.8
Ligustrum 132,886 93,295.2
etc. deciduous trees Oleaceae 33 15.8 17.2
Ulmaceae 41 23.8

Table 10.

Distribution of street tree according to species in Jangan District.

road plant >10.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
species
gil tall evergreen trees cuspidata 460 357.5 102.5
densiflora 251 148.5
strobus 295 192.5
deciduous trees biloba 1,137 357.4 779.6
glyptostroboides 842 62.4
yedoensis 1,145 365.4
shrubs japonicus 59,532 43,317.6 16,214.4
obtusifolium 72,780 56,565.6
subsessilis 16,324 109.6
ro tall evergreen trees densiflora 1,049 928.3 120.7
deciduous trees biloba 2,204 1,795.5 408.5
serrata 1,284 875.5
shrubs japonicus 39,636 19,840.6 19,795.4
obtusifolium 132,886 113,090.6
etc. deciduous trees retusus 33 24.4 8.6
serrata 41 32.4
yedoensis 12 3.4

Table 11.

Distribution of street tree according to family in Paldal District.

road plant >30.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
family
gil tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 47 29.9 17.1
deciduous trees Ginkgoaceae 1,655 246.8 1,408.2
shrubs Oleaceae 63,800 33,104 30,696
ro tall evergreen trees Pinaceae 219 137.7 81.3
deciduous trees Ginkgoaceae 1,326 194.7 1,131.3
shrubs Oleaceae 80,700 45,807.3 34,829.7
etc. deciduous trees Oleaceae 67 57.3 9.7
Rosaceae 30 20.3
shrubs Ericaceae 1,000 324.0 676.0

Table 12.

Distribution of street tree according to Genus in Paldal District.

road plant >20.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
Genus
gil tall evergreen trees Pinus 47 35.6 11.4
deciduous trees Ginkgo 1,655 716.2 938.8
shrubs Euonymus 23,160 2,696.0 20,464.0
Ligustrum 63,800 43,336.0
ro tall evergreen trees Pinus 219 164.8 54.2
deciduous trees Ginkgo 1,326 571.8 754.2
shrubs Ligustrum 80,700 57,480.2 23,219.8
Rhododendron 25,200 1,980.2
etc. deciduous trees Chionanthus 67 47.6 19.4
Prunus 30 10.6
shrubs Rhododendron 1,000 784.0 216.0

Table 13.

Distribution of street tree according to species in Paldal District.

road plant >10.1 Available street tree Decrease street tree suggested street tree
species
gil tall evergreen trees densiflora 46 40 5.7
nigra 6 0
deciduous trees biloba 1,655 1,186 469.4
serrata 691 222
yedoensis 716 247
shrubs japonicus 23,160 12,928 10,232.0
obtusifolium 63,800 53,568
ro tall evergreen trees chinensis 38 11 27.1
densiflora 219 192 27.1
deciduous trees biloba 1,326 949 377.1
buergerianum 437 60
serrata 734 357
shrubs obtusifolium 80,700 69,090 11,609.9
schlippenbachii 25,200 13,590
etc. deciduous trees retusus 67 57 9.7
yedoensis 30 20
shrubs indicum 600 492 108.0
schlippenbachii 400 292

Table 14.

Street tree Species richness, diversity index, evenness index in Suwon-si

Division ro gil etc.
Available Suggestion Available Suggestion Available Suggestion
Gwonseon-gu Number of species 37 44 33 40 15 34
Species richness 201.33 240.48 178.22 217.21 71.04 167.46
diversity index 0.39 0.42 1.19
evenness index 0.075 0.083 0.307
Yeongtong-gu Number of species 26 34 34 41 7 20
Species richness 141.93 187.34 177.03 214.59 23.48 74.36
diversity index 0.63 0.59 1.68
evenness index 0.134 0.116 0.598
Jangan-gu Number of species 18 30 26 33 3 30
Species richness 94.74 161.62 139.33 178.34 11.15 161.62
diversity index 1.19 0.63 0.77
evenness index 0.285 0.134 0.486
Paldal-gu Number of species 22 35 28 35 5 30
Species richness 112.53 182.19 144.68 182.19 21.43 155.40
diversity index 1.27 0.94 0.78
evenness index 0.285 0.196 0.336